![]() Of course it is an all digital integrated amp (with both line level and phono inputs to boot), so there is more new technology at play there than just newer Icepower.Ĭompared to BC ref1000m amps, which is one generation older, that I still use in my main bigger system, Dynaudios can sound a tad hot depending on setup, Triangles a bit cold and analytic, OHMs right on target (that system is designed around optimizing the sound with my large OHM 5 speakers). Teh sound with any of these dynamic speakers more resembles the fast airy sound of electrostats like ML or Quad than with any other amp I have used there. Just lovely! Never warm, never hot, with imaging and soundstage to die for, though the unique tonal character of each speaker does still come out. I’ve used all flavor of speaker with it (OHM, Triangle, Dynaudio) and they all sound best ever at low to modest volume. More of the same power is all I could ask for. It uses more recent generation IcePower modules, 60/w ch. The Bryston and Dyn match was superb.įor background where I am coming from, the BEl Canto C5i in my smaller two channel family room system is probably the most neutral, airy, and transparent amp I have owned. It’s either there and the system has that warm, organic sparkle, or its flat and annoying. The Bryston has very low distortion on paper, perhaps not as low as the AHB2, but to me its another "who cares" lesson because its all about the end synergy. The Bryston was heads and tails a better match. There was just something missing about the AHB2 presentation like the soul was sucked out and I could not connect to the music.Īt this time a lightly used Bryston 4B SST2 popped and I bought it. In the past I drove my dyns with a Pass X250.5, Plinius SA102, and I know how amazing they can sound at pretty much any level. After some time however, the sound grew fatiguing to me, and I noticed that it did not sound all that great when played at low to medium-low volume. It easily drove the Dyns with precise control. I found the sheer resolution very remarkable The bass was tight and tuneful. The second unit was stable with no issues. I called Benchmark and they were phenomenal with sending me out a new unit. My first AHB2 amp arrived and a problem developed shortly after I connected everything up properly, turned it on, played some music, then listened for a bit then it went into protection mode. I read pretty much every report, paper, review, etc on this piece because I was in the market for an amp -looking for a good fit with my Dynaudio Contour S3.4 LEs. I will be grateful for any comments.īack in April/May of last year I auditioned, with the intent to buy, the AHB2. My birthday is coming in a month and I could buy myself a present. I found favorable review of AHB2 vs NAD M22, but it might not apply to my situation since M22 is based on different modules (Hypex). I'm looking for anyone familiar with AHB2 and class D amps. They tend to sound warm (soft dome tweeter), with wonderful midrange. My speakers are Hyperion Sound HPS-938, (a giant killer), but not too many people are familiar with them since company went bankrupt few years ago. It could possibly extend trebles a little more (trebles are slightly veiled now). It has neutral sound, that I like, with very low noise floor (according to reviews) It matches my Benchmark DAC3 (electrically and physically) I feel that Benchmark AHB2 might be a good choice for few reasons: ![]() These modules were used in many small class D amps, including Bel Canto S300 and M300. It is basically couple of Icepower 200ASC modules packed into resonance free heavy case, with additional input differential amp THAT1200. My current amplifier, driven by Benchmark DAC3 HGC, is Rowland model 102. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |